
The Ruger LC9 is a new offering from Ruger that joins the ever-growing list of subcompact, single stack 9mm’s. These are falling very neatly into two camps- the high end offerings from Kimber, Sigarms and Kahr, that retail for upwards of $600, and the lower price-point models from Kel-Tec, Taurus and Ruger that are in the $350 range. According to Alan at Allstate Police Supply in Pomona, most of the other manufacturers want to jump on this bandwagon and should have offerings in the next six months.
This is really round two in the subcompact wars. Over the last two years or so, all of these manufacturers chased Kel-Tec in trying to get out a 7 shot .380. Ruger essentially copied Kel-Tec’s P3AT, in a slicker, smoother package. These flew off the shelves, and then came the call from gun owners for similar offerings in a 9mm.
I bought the LCP as soon as I could get my hands on one. I think it’s a great gun. Its small, it fits in a front pants pocket and it goes bang every time. I don’t have any problem with it, there are just times when I want to carry a 9mm, something with sights that packs a bit more punch than a .380, I have a Glock 26, which is a fine gun, but it is a double stack, and is heavier and bulkier than I like. I find myself carrying it less and less.
Think of the LC9 as the LCP’s bigger brother. There is clearly a family resemblance, especially in the shape of the guns and the grip; They are almost identical. The LC9 adds a left side flip-down safety and a loaded chamber indicator. Another feature the LC9 has that the LCP doesn’t is a slide lock that locks the slide back after the last round is fired. The LC9 holds 8 when fully loaded. The LC9 also adds three dot sights, where the LCP has no sights.

LC9 and LCP
Many of the reviewer in the gun rags didn’t like the safety or the loaded chamber indicator, I suspect this has to more with their understandable hatred of California’s wacky gun laws, which required these feature for it to be sold to non-law enforcement buyers, than with any practical reason. Much of their ire was directed at Ruger for supposedly caving in to California. Maybe they did, but can they really be expected to ignore the biggest gun market in the country?
My feeling is that I like the loaded chamber indicator. It doesn’t replace a press check, but it’s unobtrusive and adds an extra measure of safety without taking anything away from the functioning of the gun. As for the safety, it’s on the left side and snicks down easily. Its like a much smaller version of the safety on my Kimber 1911. I’ve carried that one daily for four years, so flipping off the safety when drawing the weapon is automatic for me. Those who don’t like the idea of a safety can opt to leave it off. It snicks down easily, but is takes a much firmer upward push to put it back on safe. It seems unlikely that one could accidently put it on safe. You have to want to do it.
I was only able to shoot about 30 rounds through the LC9. My first impression is very positive, The trigger pull was long, but not as long as the LCP. It breaks clean, and resets easily. Recoil was similar to the LCP; in other words sharp, but not too bad. I felt like it would be easy to shoot for extended periods. The sight picture was good. I really liked the sights.
This gun is accurate. I shot from the 3, 7 and 10 yard line, 6 shots each, and kept all rounds in the ten ring on a man-size target. I shot another 6 shot group from the ten yard line that was inside three inches. That’s right there with my G26, with a trigger that is substantially heavier and longer. It was better than I expected.
I think the LC9 is a little bigger than I like for front pocket carry, although it can certainly be done. I don’t like inside-the-waistband carry, so I am now looking for a strong-side open top leather belt holster. Since the LC9 is fairly new, there aren’t too many offerings specifically for it, so I will probably have to find something for the Kel-Tec Pf9, which has identical dimensions. Anyone with suggestions let me know.
I will probably make a trip to the range and run a few boxes through this gun. I will report on any problems I have but I think it will run just fine.
